Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
I think the answer is ''voting on a bill''
Answer: a) Groupthink
Explanation:
Groupthink could be defined as when group members seek to be unity and reason same way that it costs the thought pattern of the group. They so stand on their belief that they would refuse to accept the belief of other group or thought process. The R&D department at GHI Drugs has a problem concerning Groupthink because they consider their knowledge more than any other thing even though they might be wrong.
No not relay they were bleeding the colonists for money to pay for there war dept <span />
Answer:
the difference between de facto segregation and de jure segregation became important distinctions for court-mandated remedial purposes.
Explanation:
