Exploding i’m pretty sure lol
Answer:
No.
Explanation:
The contract is no longer valid because of changes in the condition of offer. By the operation of law, the occurrence of certain events will automatically terminate an agency relationship. Since Mark expressly stated that the reason he was selling the estate was because he has lost so much money, any significant cash inflow to Mark apart from the sale of the estate will ultimately affect his decision to sell. As such, the lottery he won is a cash flow and since a vital condition for selling the estate has been breached. The contract is to be declared invalid.
Answer: No, because the damage to the windshield did not result from the abnormally dangerous aspect of the plant’s activity.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the driver will not prevail. This is because the damage to the windshield did not result from the abnormally dangerous aspect of the plant’s activity.
In this case, the owner of the plant has imposed strict safety measures to prevent an explosion at the plant and the damage of the windshield of the car was due to heavy windstorm and not from the plants activities.
Answer:
a) cost of equity capital
Explanation:
A investor demand the rate of return based on the risk involved in a particular investment. The shareholders invest in the equity of the firm, the required rate of return of shareholders is the cost of equity capital. As the firm is more risky the cost of equity capital will be higher and less risky have lower cost of equity capital.
