Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: inflationary impacts are not distributed evenly across the population, therefore, inflation causes the economy to redistribute income across households.
Explanation:
To begin with, <em>inflation</em> is the name that receives, in an economic field, the term that refers to the situation where the economy of a country <em>decreases its purchasing power per unit of money</em> causing a<em> loss of real value in the unit of exchange</em>. Moreover,<em> it affects the economy in many negative ways</em>, such as the reductions of the real value of the wages, causing a more difficult situation for the people to buy the primary groceries. Furthemore, it also increases the opportunity cost of holding money, causing to discourage investment and savings.
Therefore, that it is understandable that the correct answer is the option A, due to the fact that <u><em>a high inflation do not cause a redistribution in the income of the economy to the households, actually it causes the whole oppositve impact. </em></u>
If your income is $40,000 and your income tax liability is $5,000, your marginal tax rate is: b. 12.5 percent.
Using this formula
Marginal tax rat=Tax payable/Taxable income×100
Where:
Tax payable=$5,000
Taxable income=$40,000
Let plug in the formula
Marginal tax rate=$5,000/$40,000×100
Marginal tax rate=12.5%
Inconclusion if your income is $40,000 and your income tax liability is $5,000, your marginal tax rate is: b. 12.5 percent.
Learn more here:brainly.com/question/18488309
Answer:
Charlotte has the priority to claim Autumn as her dependent even though William covered 70% of her living expenses during the year. In order for a parent to be able to claim a child as a dependent, he/she must live with the child for more than half the year. In this case, since William left the house, Charlotte has preference over claiming Autumn as her dependent (even though William lived with Autumn for 10 months). Also, a parent always has priority over other relatives including a grandparent.
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
The name for minimum energy expended to keep a resting, awake body alive is basal metabolic rate. This represents about 60% to 70% of total energy expenditure.
What is basal metabolic rate?
As we know that to keep our most life-sustaining activities at a position of rest, our body needs a lot of calories, so basal metabolic rate (BMR) simply helps in determining how much calories are actually needed to perform such activities such as energy needed at the time when our body is resting or we are sleeping. The best basal metabolic rate (BMR) is between 1000-2000, means there should be an intake of around 1000-2000 of calories each day so that these activities should be carried out.
Learn more about basal metabolic rate (BMR) here: brainly.com/question/27976523
#SPJ4
