1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ziro4ka [17]
3 years ago
5

When​ high-definition television​ (HDTV) was first considered a possibility in the United​ States, the U.S. government held a co

mpetition to select the technical standards that would be used nationwide. Why would the government see an advantage to setting one​ standard?
History
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

High definition television also called advanced television because of the technological innovations used in its manufacturing. It has improved the quality of picture films and ensured high-quality sound and there termed as the next generation of television. The government planned to set for one standard because a new product in the market whose standard is not set could result in inferior quality. Secondly, one standard allows the states to work together and expand their commercial ties.

You might be interested in
Why was it possible for the Netherlands but not Belgium to maintain neutrality during Germany’s attack on France in World War I?
Nadya [2.5K]

its C : Germany had to invade Belgium to get to northern France but not the Netherlands

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who wrote Exposition and Protest and emerged by the early 1830s as the most prominent spokesman for the right of nullification?
max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

b. John C. Calhoun.

Explanation:

The South Carolina Exposition and Protest, known as Calhoun's Exposition, was written in December 1828 by John C. Calhoun,

Calhoun was Vice President of the United States at the time when John Quincy Adams and Jackson were in turn .

This document, also known as Calhoun Exposition,

exposes Calhoun's doctrine of nullification and sets out the idea that a state has the right to reject federal law. It exposes the reasons for doing that and under which conditions.

Thus, any state has a legitimate right to set aside or strike down any federal law that that state has found to regard as unconstitutional with respect to the Constitution of the United States.

8 0
3 years ago
Really need help with this Q!!!!!
Gnoma [55]
I think its choice one 
6 0
3 years ago
What did the tree fifths compromise do
8090 [49]

The Three-Fifths Compromise. The Three-Fifths Compromise outlined the process for states to count slaves as part of the population in order to determine representation and taxation for the federal government.

8 0
3 years ago
Why were the little rock nine banned in Central High School?
Valentin [98]


i took the test


ghgbnjcgjbvb
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What beliefs System saw all of creation as a continuum with man at the top of the animal world?
    13·2 answers
  • Yo prevent tyranny the authors of the constitution drew on Montesquieus concept of having
    5·1 answer
  • How did the of the war with mexico help fullfill what many amaericans saw as their countrys
    7·1 answer
  • When might a supreme court justice write a concurring opinion? when the chief justice assigns the associate justice to write a c
    11·1 answer
  • Under the constitution who is directly in charge of electing the president
    11·1 answer
  • What was the impact of the 1862 Homestead Act on the West?​
    6·1 answer
  • Imagine you were a reporter in 1938 who had been asked to write a news article on Kristallnacht. Write a two paragraph summary o
    7·1 answer
  • -------------------------
    10·1 answer
  • Join tmg-amdd-okh come on​
    11·2 answers
  • 4. According to the figure on the
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!