1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Orlov [11]
3 years ago
10

Given the historical cost of product Dominoe is $22, the selling price of product Dominoe is $30, costs to sell product Dominoe

are $5, the replacement cost for product Dominoe is $20, and the normal profit margin is 20% of sales price, what is the amount that should be used to value the inventory under the lower-of-cost-or-market?
Business
1 answer:
olga_2 [115]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Amount to be used to value inventory = $22

Explanation:

Inventories are generally valued at lower of cost or market value.

In that, cost is considered:

Net Realizable Value = Selling price less any cost = $30 - $5 = $25

Cost = $22

Since the Net Realizable Value is more than cost, replacement cost will not be considered.

Where NRV is less than cost, then replacement value is considered.

Here, Therefore inventory will be recorded as $22 at cost.

You might be interested in
The compensation associated with executive stock option plans is:A. The book value of a share of the company's shares times the
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": The estimated fair value of the options.

Explanation:

Employee Stock Options or ESOs are equity compensations given be firms typically to high-range executives. The company provides the workers with call options so employees can purchase the derivatives at a certain price and time. These types of compensations are useful as motivations for the employees to help them perform better in their duties.

5 0
3 years ago
Anthony and Michelle Constantino just got married and received ​$29,000 in cash gifts for their wedding. How much will they have
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

Future value will be larger with smaller compounding period; $373.4 more would be earned with shorter compounding period.

Explanation:

Given:

Amount to be invested = 29,000÷2 = $14,500

Duration if amount invested = 25 years

Rate = 4% or 0.04 compounded annually

Value of investment at the end of 25 years = 14,500\times(1+0.04)^{25}

                                                                         = $38,654.63

Future value if compounded annually is $38,654.63

Future value if semi-compounded annually:

Duration = 25×2 = 50 periods

Rate = 0.04÷2 = 0.02

Value of investment at the end of = 14,500\times(1+0.02)^{50}

                                                                         = $39,028.03

Future value if semi-compounded annually is $39,028.03

As such, future value is larger if compounding period was 6 months.

They would have earned $373.40 more that is (39,028.03 - 38,654.63), with shorter period.

8 0
3 years ago
QUICKEST AND BEST ANSWER GETS A FOLLOW AND BRAINLIEST
Bumek [7]
Back in 2015, McDonald’s was struggling. In Europe, sales were down 1.4% across the previous 6 years; 3.3% down in the US and almost 10% down across Africa and the Middle East. There were a myriad of challenges to overcome. Rising expectations of customer experience, new standards of convenience, weak in-store technology, a sprawling menu, a PR-bruised brand and questionable ingredients to name but a few.

McDonald’s are the original fast-food innovators; creating a level of standardisation that is quite frankly, remarkable. Buy a Big Mac in Beijing and it’ll taste the same as in Stratford-Upon Avon.

So when you’ve optimised product delivery, supply chain and flavour experience to such an incredible degree — how do you increase bottom line growth? It’s not going to come from making the Big Mac cheaper to produce — you’ve already turned those stones over (multiple times).

The answer of course, is to drive purchase frequency and increase margins through new products.
Numerous studies have shown that no matter what options are available, people tend to stick with the default options and choices they’ve made habitually. This is even more true when someone faces a broad selection of choices. We try to mitigate the risk of buyers remorse by sticking with the choices we know are ‘safe’.

McDonald’s has a uniquely pervasive presence in modern life with many of us having developed a pattern of ordering behaviour over the course of our lives (from Happy Meals to hangover cures). This creates a unique, and less cited, challenge for McDonald’s’ reinvention: how do you break people out of the default buying behaviours they’ve developed over decades?


In its simplest sense, the new format is designed to improve customer experience, which will in turn drive frequency and a shift in buying behaviour (for some) towards higher margin items. The most important shift in buying patterns is to drive reappraisal of the Signature range to make sure they maximise potential spend from those customers who can afford, and want, a more premium experience.
I hope this was helpful
8 0
3 years ago
Harold Manufacturing produces denim clothing. This year, it produced 5,000 denim jackets at a manufacturing cost of $45 each. Th
saw5 [17]

Answer:

ALTERNATIVE 1 $30,000

ALTERNATIVE 2 $28,000

ALTERNATIVE 3 $33,000

Explanation:

Calculation for the incremental income

ALTERNATIVE 1 Sell as it is

Incremental revenue $30,000

(5,000*$6)

Incremental costs $0

Incremental Income $30,000

ALTERNATIVE 2 Disassemble and sell to recycler

Incremental revenue $60,000

(5,000*$12)

Incremental costs $32,000

Incremental Income $28,000

ALTERNATIVE3 Rework and turn into good jackets

Incremental revenue $135,000

(3,000*$45)

Incremental costs $102,000

Incremental Income $33,000

Therefore based on the above calculation the company should choose ALTERNATIVE 3 of the amount of $33,000

4 0
3 years ago
After the accounts are adjusted and closed at the end of the fiscal year, Accounts Receivable has a balance of $703,938 and Allo
JulijaS [17]

The net realizable value of accounts receivable is $684,204

Explanation:

  • To calculate subtract the doubtful-accounts allowance from the total accounts receivable. The result will be the net realizable value of accounts receivable.
  • accounts receivable = $703,938
  • doubtful-accounts = $19,734.
  • the net realizable value of accounts receivable =
  • accounts receivable ± doubtful-accounts
  • Therefore, the net realizable value of accounts receivable is $684,204

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hercules Company purchased a computer for $4,800 on December 1. It is estimated that annual
    6·1 answer
  • What did you discusss in your response? Check all that apply
    15·1 answer
  • During November, the production department of a process operations system completed and transferred to finished goods 35,000 uni
    7·1 answer
  • The Haskins Company manufactures and sells radios. Each radio sells for $76.00 and the variable cost per unit is $40.00. Haskin'
    11·1 answer
  • Mark Johnson invests a fixed percentage of his salary at the end of each year. This year he invested $1500 For the next 5 years,
    10·1 answer
  • suppose company has a 32% income tax rate, a contribution margin ratio of 45% and fixe costs of 664,000. what sales volume is ne
    13·1 answer
  • Medoc Company provides the following information about its single product Targeted operating income 54 comma 790 Selling price p
    8·1 answer
  • A more efficient means of processing algae to produce an anticancer drug is discovered. as a result, the supply curve for the dr
    9·1 answer
  • 2. Why might this be the perfect advice for beginning investors?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a limitation of the planning process at Wirecard? Check all that apply.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!