I would say b. Bitter opposition to a U.S. war.
Art can be used as a tool for change because it allows people to freely express their feelings without restrictions.
<h3>What is the art?</h3>
Art is a set of expressions that encompasses acting, singing, music, painting, sculpture, theater, among others. It is a form of human expression in which feelings are transmitted to other people.
In general, art can be conceived as a tool for change because it allows people to freely express their feelings without restrictions. Additionally, art can change a person's life because it offers a different view of the world around him.
On the other hand, art is a way of motivating people to stay away from criminal practices because it makes them part of a group in which they will be able to develop their personality in a positive way with the support of several people.
Learn more about art in: brainly.com/question/19049629
#SPJ1
A little bit confused on the question, seeing how there are no answers handed to us, however, I am assuming that the answer is wear gloves and have no loose articles of clothing, and no open-toed shoes (such as sandals)
I may talk about how my crops grow and talk about the climate weather in our place.The brother-in-law might tell me about how his live is,and how much fish he gets a day.My brother-in-law may say he lives in Alaska and the farmer may say he lives in Georgia.Geography will make the people want more governments than one cause there a a lot of states in America.And in geography,it shows you the states in America,and they are quite far away,so people wants more governments.
Answer:
C.) While both the Ottoman Empire and Western European states relied heavily on forced conversions to expand and maintain their empires, the Ottoman Empire remained more religiously tolerant than the Western European empires.
Explanation:
I got this question right on the first try. Here's why I knew it was C. You would need to have some knowledge about the Ottoman Empire's role of religion. I don't know if it says in the passage, so if you do find it, then give me a heads up. Remember, how did the Ottoman Empire treat the minorities? Did they force persecution/conversion to Islam? Well, not really. Although they did develop the devshirme system, it was kinda of a force conversion because the children had to give up their Christian belief, but it was seen as an opportunity. They weren't punished, so answer A is not right. So they did practice religious tolerance. Also the Ottoman Empire tried to expand the empire to make it bigger as well. There wasn't any religious wars carried out the Ottoman Empire, and answer B does not make sense. Where in the passage does it say about those two empires having efforts of doing mass conversions. Look at Source 2. Sorry if this explanation is long, but I hope this helps :)
