All categories

3 years ago

Which number is the best estimate of 866,214,000,000

Mathematics

1 answer:

miskamm [114]3 years ago

3 0

This question is Incomplete because it lacks the appropriate options

Complete Question

Which number is the best estimate of 866,214,000,000 using powers of 10

a) 9 × 10¹¹

b) 8 × 10¹¹

c) 10 × 11¹⁰

d) 8 × 10-¹¹

Answer:

a) 9 × 10¹¹

Step-by-step explanation:

When we want to estimate a number using the power of 10, we are trying to write the number in a standard form.

We are to estimate :866,214,000,000 using powers of 10

Hence,

8.66214000000 × 10¹¹

We round up to the nearest whole number

= 9 × 10¹¹

Therefore, the best estimate for 866,214,000,000 using powers of 10

= 9 × 10¹¹

You might be interested in

I NEED HELP ASAPPPP

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

you add the nubers then subtract th 7

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Pablo decide ahorrar su dinero en una alcancía y cada día ahorra $100 más que el día anterior ¿cuánto ahorraría el día "20" si e

Luden [163]

Answer:

Pablo decides to save his money in a piggy bank and each day he saves $ 100 more than the day before. How much would he save on day "20" if he had $ 100 on the first day? Express the function and solve

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

What is the slope of the line

Alexxandr [17]

(2,2) (-1,4) I think

5 0

3 years ago

Mr. Wells runs a telecommunications company. While going through the company's project records, he found that there were 8 engin

Allisa [31]

There are 12 project managers that are employed by Mr. Wells

<h3>Further explanation</h3>

Solving linear equation mean calculating the unknown variable from the equation.

Let the linear equation : y = mx + c

If we draw the above equation on Cartesian Coordinates , it will be a straight line with :

<em>m → gradient of the line</em>

<em>( 0 , c ) → y - intercept</em>

Gradient of the line could also be calculated from two arbitrary points on line ( x₁ , y₁ ) and ( x₂ , y₂ ) with the formula :

$\large {\boxed{m = \frac{y_2 - y_1}{x_2 - x_1}}}$

If point ( x₁ , y₁ ) is on the line with gradient m , the equation of the line will be :

$\large {\boxed{y - y_1 = m ( x - x_1 )}}$

<em>Let us tackle the problem!</em>

$\texttt{ }$

This problem is about Directly Proportional.

<em>There were 8 engineers under every team leader.</em>

$\texttt{1 Team Leader} \rightarrow \texttt{8 engineers}$

$\texttt{15 Team Leader} \rightarrow 15 \times \texttt{8 engineers} = \boxed{\texttt{120 engineers}}$

$\texttt{ }$

<em>There were 5 project managers for every 50 engineers.</em>

$\texttt{50 engineers} \rightarrow \texttt{5 project managers}$

$\texttt{120 engineers} \rightarrow (120 \div 50) \times \texttt{5 project managers} = \boxed{\texttt{12 project managers}}$

$\texttt{ }$

<h3>Learn more</h3>

Infinite Number of Solutions : brainly.com/question/5450548
System of Equations : brainly.com/question/1995493
System of Linear equations : brainly.com/question/3291576

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade: High School

Subject: Mathematics

Chapter: Linear Equations

Keywords: Linear , Equations , 1 , Variable , Line , Gradient , Point

7 0

3 years ago

A political polling agency predicts candidate A will win an election with 63% of the votes. Their poll has a margin of error of

scoray [572]

Answer:

56% ≤ p ≤ 70%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following :

Predicted % of votes to win for candidate A= 63%

Margin of Error in prediction = ±7%

Which inequality represents the predicted possible percent of votes, x, for candidate A?

Let the interval = p

Hence,

|p - prediction| = margin of error

|p - 63%| = ±7%

Hence,

Upper boundary : p = +7% + 63% = 70%

Lower boundary : p = - 7% + 63% = 56%

Hence,

Lower boundary ≤ p ≤ upper boundary

56% ≤ p ≤ 70%

5 0

3 years ago