Answer:
B. is not liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own.
Explanation:
Mike who is a dispatch rider, decided to see his girlfriend, Jackie, who lived 50 miles off his pizza route. He had an accident while driving to his girlfriend's, and injured a pedestrian, Chuck due to his negligent driving.
Under the circumstances, Frank's Pizza isn't liable because Mike was on a frolic of his own. Mike embarking on a 50 mile drive to see his girlfriend is frolicsome and outside the scope of his employment as a delivery agent.
Hence, this will absolve his employer from any liability as he wasn't working on the designated route at the time.
The land ordinance of 1785 was the law that organized a way to divide and sell the land in the northwest territory. This law was the Ordinance of 1784 which was the resolution written by Thomas Jefferson who aims at the congress in order to call for an action. The law wants to fathom the mode of locating and disposing the lands in western territories in order to be used in other purposes.
The best thing that I can do is to work in my task while giving instructions to my co worker on what to do in regard to the thing he or she needs help on. The least thing I can do is not to help someone who is in need as I know in the future I may need one's help too.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
As we know that the closing would be conducted by the closing agent not with the seller agent. The closing agent could be the worker or the employer etc
Therefore the given statement is false
Hence, it is not a true statement
So the same is to be relevant
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The above statement is true as the distracted driving is act of driving along with engaging into certain other activities which leads to the driver's lesser concentration and attention towards the the road and driving.
Since good teens are not supposed to make the poor choices while driving and engage into activities like using phone, texting or reading maps or messages etc.
