Answer:
Parallelism
Explanation:
The given excerpt is an example of parallelism.
Parallelism (also known as parallel structure or parallel construction) is a figure of speech in which phrases in a sentence are grammatically the same or similar in construction, sound, meaning, or meter. The purpose of parallelism is to give balance, clarity, pattern, or rhythm.
In the second sentence of the excerpt, we have several repetitions:
- <u>There was </u>no hurry, for <u>there was</u> nowhere to go. (there + past simple tense + negation)
- ... nowhere <u>to go</u>, nothing <u>to buy</u> and no money <u>to buy</u> it with, nothing<u> to see</u> outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (negation + infinitive)
- ... <u>nothing to buy</u> and no money to buy it with, <u>nothing to see</u> outside the boundaries of Maycomb County. (a part of the repetition I previously pointed out - nothing + infinitive).
I don't know for problem 4 because we were not given the poems. However, problem 7 is the last option and problem 9 is the second option.
Answer:
Who would write an essay for five points?
Explanation:
John thought again to himself. How could he possible write a short story with all ten of these words?
"Acclaim, adjacent, elicit, engross, escalate, exploit, methodical," he mumbles to himself. They just don't seem to go along with one another. Then, an idea comes through his mind.
"Obsolete, tangible, terminate... I got it!" John immediately scribbles down some sentences on his loose leaf. He has finally finished his assignment.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Ratings does not have affect on the validity of the source, it only shows the exposure said show/source received the day it was aired. It doesn't mean anything in terms of reliability.
Meanwhile exaggeration, leaving out information, and reformatting events for entertainment purposes all have great impacts on the reliability of a source.
The other options are very important questions while reviewing any source but in this case B is the correct option.