Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
A. democratic party was split.
They wanted to find more natural resources, and they also wanted to seek out new markets for European goods.
Answer:
kerosene was used for heat and the light
Answer: Neutrality
Explanation:The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible."
This supports a foreign policy called Neutrality which was said by George Washington in addressing the United States to avoid permanent alliances with other nations.
Neutrality describes a state of being neutral, unbiased and not to practice favouritism when connected to participation in war.
