They should reinforce the desired change in the employees.
The brainest answer would be appreciated.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: Cell
Explanation:
To begin with, the name of "Cellular Manufacturing" is known in the business field for being one type of manufacturing process that can be selected among others in order to use it as the method of excellence to produce the good that the company wants to sell. Moreover, this type of process is characterized by the fact that the process involves a number of various machines that do a task in particular, called cells, that can easily change that task in order to do another one that the manufacturer will need so that implicates that this type of method is very helpfull in those companies who develop products that are intended to be changed continuously.
Answer:
-2, 4 and -8
Explanation:
Given the nth term of a GP expressed as;
When n = 1
when n = 2
when n = 3
Hence the first three terms of the sequence are -2, 4 and -8
Answer:
1. How the nation allocates resources
Explanation:
Government is the chief decision maker in any economic model because their power enables to allocate nation`s resources among economic unit. As such they keep watch on the economic changes and trends in order to make the best economic decision for the nation. When government becomes aware of economic changes, it will try to allocate resources efficiently and effectively based on signal given by the changes.
For example, if US government is aware that the economy is nearing recession, it will be put in preventive measures to escape the intending recession and make sure it allocates its scarce in efficient way among the economic units by spending more on capital projects, raising social empowerment spending and doing other necessary things.
So the discovery of economic changes will most likely influence how the nation allocates resources.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
