None of the options shows an alternative Tina has, a real alternative would be a credit card and cash ($190)
In economics, an alternative is an element that replaces or substitutes another. For an element to be considered an alternative it needs:
- To belong to the same category or have the same function.
- To be possible for the user to replace the first element using the alternative.
Based on this, let's analyze each of the options:
- Jacket and $100: These are not alternatives because Tina wants a jacket and this product cannot be replaced with money as money will not protect Tina from cold weather.
- Shoes and a jacket: These are not alternatives because Tina wants the two products not only one.
- Credit card and $100: These would be alternatives if the total cost was $100. However, using a credit card Tina can pay for both products but using $100 she can only pay for one of the products.
Therefore, the options do not present alternatives; but one valid alternative is a credit card and $190.
Learn more in
900,000 / 1/4 = liabilities
900,000 - liabilities - stockholder's equity
900,000/4 = 225,000
900,000 - 225,000 = 675,000
Answer:
increases as more people use them.
Explanation:
Network economics refers to a business that uses network effect. It is also called Netromix. The value of a good is increased as the number of buyers increases.
The business will benefit from feedback received by customers that use their products.
For example online services like LinkedIn and Twitter benefit from this type of framework. The more users that use these software th more the business gains.
Answer:
Gasoline is a normal good
Explanation:
Normal goods are goods that are goods whose demand increases when income increases and falls when income falls
Inferior goods are goods whose demand falls when income rises and increases when income falls.
Because the demand for gasoline falls when income falls, gasoline is a normal good.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Improperly packed by the party shipping them.
Explanation:
Carriers are liable for the loss of goods being transported by them under three scenarios: acts of God (<em>because they are unpredictable</em>), acts of the shipper (<em>negligence of the person providing with the goods being transported</em>), and acts of a public enemy (<em>a country engaging into the war</em>).
In that case, <em>the carrier is likely not to be found liable if the shipping items were incorrectly packaged the sending party</em>.
