Operations managers can use the mathematical tool of linear programming to plan and make resource allocation decisions. Hence. option (c) will be the suitable response for this question.
<h3>Give a brief account on linear programming.</h3>
An approach to getting the optimal result in a mathematical model whose requirements are expressed by linear connections is linear programming, often known as linear optimization.
Specifically, linear programming is a technique for optimizing a linear objective function while observing the constraints of linear equality and inequality. Its feasible region consists of convex polytopes, a set that is defined as the intersection of a finite number of half spaces, each of which is determined by a linear inequality. A real-valued affine function that is defined on this polyhedron serves as its goal function. If there is a location in the polytope where this function has the least value, a linear programming technique locates it.
To know more about, linear programming, visit :
brainly.com/question/28036767
#SPJ4
Options:
a. not entitled to more than 50 percent of the profits, because the parties historically had divided the profits fifty-fifty.
b. not entitled to more than 50 percent of the profits, because it was appropriate to apply partnership principles to an LLC when there was no operating agreement.
c. entitled to more than 50 percent of the profits, because Hurwitz would be unjustly enriched if he received 50 percent of the profits.
d. entitled to more than 50 percent of the profits, because it was the parties' intent to compensate Padden to a greater extent than Hurwitz
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Since neither the partnership nor the limited liability company had any partnership agreement that stated how Hurwitz and Padden would share the profits generated by the business, then the general rule of partnerships should apply, i.e. profits and losses must be divided equally among all the partners.
Answer:
Return on Assets (2006) = 7.60 %
Explanation:
Return on Assets = Earnings Before Interest and Tax ÷ Total Assets
Therefore,
Return on Assets (2006) = ($115,000 + $30,000) / ( $600,000 + $60,000 + $900,000) × 100
= $118,000 / $1,560,000 × 100
= 7.60 % (one decimal place)
The feature of the insurance contract that is being described above is the aleatory contract. It is the type of contact where the individual that has been involved can't handle or control the event that could happen to him or her. It is a way of having uncertain events happening in the individual such as death or natural disasters that she or he could face.
Answer:
The Seller would be primarily liable
Explanation:
Since in the question, it is mentioned that the seller had sold a house to a buyer for taking up the loan i.e. based on a subject. But after two years the buyer does the default and does not pay the money.
Therefore for lending the note, the seller is primarily liable as the seller permit the buyer for taking the loan
