In the first lines of the play, they are referred to as the "star-crossed lovers," meaning they were fated to meet and fall helplessly in love. And the action he creates transpires over a handful of days; at the end of these few days, Romeo and Juliet are willing to die for each other. Thus, there does seem to be some credence for the "love at first sight" analysis.
Romeo certainly proclaims his love for Juliet as soon as he beholds her:
Did my heart love till now? Forswear it, sight!
For I ne’er saw true beauty till this night.
He immediately forgets his misery over Rosaline, which has plagued him for the entire play thus far, and becomes much more hopeful with this immediate change in demeanor. When he finds out that Juliet is a Capulet, he bemoans, "My life is my foe’s debt"
Explanation:
presentation is to present something about given topic or it is the explanation of topic in front of people
Answer:
Quote by atticus finch
Page number 115
Mocking bird
Explanation:
Atticus finch is a widower who was responsible for the upbringing of his two kid who were first embarrassed by the father's age with there's compared to the age disparities of father and children in th society but later respected their father because of his wisdom. He told this quotes to his two children Scott and Jen as a moral lesson for them learn the true meaning of courage which is different from just holding a gun in a society.
Answer:
the one the question is refering to.
The writing 'rule' (myth) Churchill's reply satirizes is the 'Never end a sentence on a preposition' rule (i.g. as I intetionally did on the immediate sentence before this one). And his reply to it was something like 'This is the type of errant pedantry up with which I will not put.'
The 'rule' is a myth, yes, but of course what Churchill did was an exaggeration to sneeringly point out the ignorance of those who criticized him.
His sentence therefore was incorrect. One possible change to improve it could be: 'This is the type of errant pedantry which I will not put up with.'
Specially the 'up' and 'with' of 'put up with' could never go in the middle of a sentence, as 'put up with' is a phrasal verb, meaning the verb and the preposition must always be together in the correct order.
I was able to find some possible variations of what his sentence could have actually had been, but in none of them the 'up with' goes along with 'put', so either ways we can assume that his sentence was deliberately wrong.
Explanation:
brainly
Answer:
Mothers to son by langston hughes
