1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
trapecia [35]
3 years ago
10

Why didn’t group polarization occur in 12 Angry Men? A. Juror 8 used informational social influence to convince the other jurors

he was correct B. Juror 8 used heuristic persuasion to convince the other jurors he was correct C. Juror 8 used the contact hypothesis to convince the other jurors that he was correct. D. Juror 8 was used systematic arguments in his persuasion
Social Studies
2 answers:
RideAnS [48]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D. Juror 8 was consistent and used systematic arguments in his persuasion

Explanation:

In a 1957 movie titled 12 Angry Men, centers around the case of an 18year old boy(defendant) about the possibility of killing his own father. While the 11 jurors had initially voted the 18year old boy guilty, Juror 8 felt that, they should not hastily consider the defendant guilty, but rather discussions should be held, before voting "guilty or not guilty".

In the end, Juror 8, going by the character name Davis, was consistent and able to systematically swayed the opinions of other 11 jurors, such that each of the other jurors were able to question their initial position logically, and they were able to determined that, the defendant was actually not the murderer nor guilty of the murder case.

denis23 [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

D. Juror 8 was consistent and used systematic arguments in his persuasion

Explanation:

Twelve Angry Men is about a jury, that must give a verdict in a murder trial.

In order to make a verdict, every juror must agree about the defendant being guilty or innocent.

However, in the movie, juror 8 is the only person to believe the defendant is innocent. As juror 8 defends his verdict of not guilty, other juror start to question their own ethics, prejudices, intelligence and thought.

In conclusion, as more juror changed their verdicts, there is an increased pressure for the other juror to change theirs as well.

You might be interested in
Justify limitations to the right of freedom of expression
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

The freedom of expression of minorities and political dissenters may be targeted for reasons that are not publicly justifiable. In this context, majoritarian interests can infiltrate limitation grounds such as national security, public order, public health, and public morals.

6 0
3 years ago
The most basic or lowest-level need in maslow's hierarchy of human motives includes the need for:
ohaa [14]
The most basic need in Maslow’s hierarchy is physiological, or physical survival
6 0
3 years ago
Explain how regional development will bring a face lift of the country. ​
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

i am unknow that it is correct or not but i am ready to share ypu my education about it

Explanation:

Regional development is a broad term but can be seen as a general effort to reduce regional disparities by supporting (employment and wealth-generating) economic activities in regions. In the past, regional development policy tended to try to achieve these objectives by means of large-scale infrastructure development and by attracting inward investment (OECD,2020).

here you go

5 0
3 years ago
What factor do Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, and Regents of California v. Bakke have in common?
algol [13]

Answer:

All three cases went to the Supreme Court for ruling.

Explanation:

The cases that went to the supreme corut ruling will be more likely to be considered as a landmark decision, which is the type of decisions that influence the live of the people on national scale.

I'll describe the effect of each decisions on national scale:

-Plessy v. Ferguson,

This decision resulted in the application of segregation law. Black people all across the nation were required to use different public facilities than the white citizens because of this.

- Brown v. Board of Education,

This decision diminish the effect of plessy v. Ferguson since it make the segregation of schools become illegal.

- Regents of California v. Bakke

This affect the people nationally because it allow race to become a factor for college admission . (It become the basis of affirmative action that help minorities get into universities)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the United States electoral college
VladimirAG [237]
D) The electoral college is responsible for electing the president
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sheila, diagnosed with severe adhd, moves back and forth between a classroom and a learning lab. Her teacher monitors her behavi
    11·2 answers
  • What are 4 examples of congressional oversight?<br><br> The class is U.S government.
    8·1 answer
  • In mischel's terminology, the __________ of an extraverted person might include knowing how to begin a conversation with a stran
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following countries has the most territory per the Antarctic Treaty
    8·1 answer
  • According to the author of Hebrews, Jesus’ priestly duties were not performed in an earthly sanctuary, a mere copy of the heaven
    9·1 answer
  • The __________ is considered among the most powerful in the house of representatives because it has great power over the conditi
    6·1 answer
  • In Texas, appellate courts:
    6·1 answer
  • Which quality does a spider signify, according to the Osage tribe?
    9·2 answers
  • How was WW1 fought? what technology, warfare was used. ( answer both questions please)
    9·2 answers
  • How did the United States react to the bombing seen the phonographs?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!