1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marin [14]
4 years ago
14

What happens when there is no limit to power?

History
1 answer:
stepladder [879]4 years ago
6 0
Corruption. power creates dictators. for example there is an old term that referred to a byzantine emperor which was “autocrat” it basically meant someone who ruled by themselves and only themselves. they had no royal court to make decisions for them nor a vice emperor (vice president basically). No limit to power gives an individual chaotic ability to do anything w/o consequence.
You might be interested in
Three events promoted america to declare war on Germany??
Paha777 [63]

1. the invasion of neutral Belgium and stories of German atrocities in the country which shocked and outraged the Americans

2. In May 1915, a German U-boat sunk the British passenger ship Lusitania off the coast of Ireland. Over 1,000 passengers were killed, including 128 Americans

3. In 1917, Germany sent a telegram to Mexico suggesting that if the US should declare war on Germany, Mexico should declare war on the US In return, Mexico would get back the territory lost in the Mexican-American War Unfortunately for Germany, the telegram was intercepted by the British and hurriedly given to the Americans

4 0
3 years ago
The 5th and 6th amendments list several different rights that are protected. List the different rights with each amendment separ
Lera25 [3.4K]
5th amendment: right to a just trial
6th amendment: right to a speedy trial
8 0
4 years ago
Once in power, How did the economy perform under the leadership of Benito Mussolini?
Mice21 [21]
The power sharing arrangement that the fascist had in the Italian governments in the 1920s helped to prepare some of its members to handle parts of the economy well when the global depression hit. The investment in what we call "infrastructure" was an appropriate public use of money. The modernization of healthcare in the 1930s put many women through medical schools so they could staff the village and town clinics built as part of the public works program. These useful public works and the hydroelectric plants created to power the "re-birth" of the Roman Empire under Mussolini and his fascist technocrats planned to build and rule. The move towards autarky in the 1930s was a wasteful and foolish plan to be self-sufficient in a way that Italy never was during the actual era of the Roman Empire. So while the public health and the infrastructure spending was appropriate and helpful to Italian society, war and autarky were economically disastrous distortions of a nationalist economic system. The disaster that was the "struggle for wheat" and the "struggle for iron" and entry into war on the side of Germany sank the Italian economy.
7 0
4 years ago
Use the diagram to answer the question.
vovikov84 [41]

Answer: reduced storage and shipping costs for farmers

Explanation:

Populism emerged from the demand of the small scale farmers for agrarian reform in the Great Plains, Rockies, and the cotton-belt states.

The farmers started their revolt by founding the National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry in 1867. The Grange used its political power to approve farmer-friendly laws, such as the Granger Laws, which established maximum railroad prices.

5 0
3 years ago
Are Senator Morrill's comments recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production? Explain.
netineya [11]

It should be noted that  Senator Morrill's comments are recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production.

<h3>How did Laissez Faire related to Industrial Revolution politically? </h3>

Laissez Faire can be see to have effect on the Industrial Revolution by taking power from the government even the allowance  to interfere in the businesses is not given.

More also, Laissez-faire  which is been referred to as the policy of minimum governmental interference  that is been seen in the economic affairs of individuals as well as the  society.

In conclusion, the  doctrine of laissez-faire can be seen to be associated with the economists  Physiocrats,  from France from year  1778,therefore, It should be noted that  Senator Morrill's comments are recommending a "laissez-faire" approach to industrial production.

Learn more about laissez-faire from

brainly.com/question/17259480

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did women’s involvement in other reform movements affect the women’s rights movement?
    10·1 answer
  • Who was allowed to vote after the American revolution
    11·2 answers
  • President eisenhower convinced the american people that the brown decision was the correct decision and a good decision for the
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a power that all governors have the state legislatures?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the point-of-view of 13 reasons why book
    11·1 answer
  • What point is the excerpt making about the powers and limitations of state governors?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did manufacturers hire children to work in their factories?
    15·2 answers
  • Who helped pass the 24th amendment
    12·1 answer
  • Which nonfiction genre involves true accounts of only past periods or events?
    13·2 answers
  • Who was the commander of u.s. navy in the pacific​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!