1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
3 years ago
5

One of the most controversial turning points in history was the decision made by I.S president Harry S. Thurman to use atomic we

apons on japan the lone remaining Axis power at the conclusion of world war 11 in your opinion was the decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki a military necessity? If not was It justifiable for a reason other than milk necessitiy ?
History
1 answer:
tankabanditka [31]3 years ago
6 0
In my opinion, I think the bombs being dropped were necessary. Japan had a strict military system that was hard to make them surrender. It included dying for your country was the most honor you would ever live for and that if you were selected to be a fighter or suicide flyer that you would have to or face serious consequences, not just for you, but extreme humiliation for your family. Truman saw this as we can invade and lose our lives too(American lives) or go to a speedy end to WW2 by dropping the atomic bomb. 
You might be interested in
How did theodore roosevelt change the conception of the presidency? whig?
Mashcka [7]

As President, Roosevelt pushed executive powers to new limits, arguing that the rise of industrial capitalism had rendered limited government obsolete.

Roosevelt’s stewardship theory unmoored presidential power from the Constitution and made it directly accountable to the people.

Roosevelt continued until his death to press for Progressive reforms that would move the country closer to the social democracies of Europe.

5 0
3 years ago
What was the most significant effect of U-boat attacks on the fighting on land ?
Lelechka [254]

They destroyed vital supplies. What is one way the Eastern Front was different from the Western Front? The Eastern Front had front lines that moved widely, while the Western Front did not.

7 0
3 years ago
What was the lending cause of the pullman strike
Vlada [557]

The Pullman strike was caused by the panic of 1893, George Pullman, which increased hours for working and they cut down wages.


Hopefully this will help someone out! :)


5 0
3 years ago
Who was Toussaint L'Ouverture? (1 point)
Elan Coil [88]

Explanation:

(d) A former slave who led the Haitian rebellion

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3,989 is what percent of 8,000
BARSIC [14]
Answer: 49.8% ..............
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Non-example of republicanism
    5·2 answers
  • Which detail should be included in a summary of Elizabeth Van Lew’s role as a spymaster during the Civil War?
    9·2 answers
  • True or false? the new national assembly when it’s immediately get rid of the monarchy completely
    9·1 answer
  • What group didn't support Jimmy Carter during his 1976 campaign?
    7·1 answer
  • What country does not have certain unalienable right such as we do in the United States. Describe the rights they have and discu
    15·1 answer
  • What did bill Clinton do about civil rights
    11·1 answer
  • What is some good food in canada
    14·2 answers
  • What did south carolina secede from the union​
    5·2 answers
  • What did the Spanish, French, and Dutch hope to gain when they colonized America? (Please hurry)
    13·2 answers
  • What is the definition of concept music?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!