1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kifflom [539]
2 years ago
14

Why is it important to have constitution amended

History
2 answers:
Eddi Din [679]2 years ago
6 0
To have laws and enfocement to enforce those laws and keep peace among citizens
77julia77 [94]2 years ago
5 0
So every one would get along and accept differences
You might be interested in
What is the greatest grievance that John Hancock had against the rule of the British crown?
Lorico [155]
The first one would be your answer, Imposing British governors in the colonies.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who did not benefit from imperialism in Africa and why not?
Paul [167]

Answer:

African countries that were colonized because of imperialism did not benefit.

Explanation:

The people who colonized them (mostly Britain and France) stole their resources and enslaved their people. Many African countries never got a chance to develop because of Western European imperialism.

3 0
3 years ago
एeoजा.
Kitty [74]

Answer:

a.

Explanation: none needed

5 0
3 years ago
The immigration act of 1924 produced highly discriminatory results because it
Kazeer [188]
 The Immigration Act of 1924 produced highly discriminatory results because it set a max on how many immigrants could come to the US depending on what country they came from.

For example, there were many more opportunities for citizens from countries like Germany, Great Britain, and Sweden in comparison to individuals from Italy or Russia. Here are some numbers to support this claim:

Germany's Quota (aka amount that could come into US)- 51,227
Great Britain and Northern Ireland's Quota- 34,0007
Sweden's Quota- 9,561
Italy's Quota- 3,845
Russia's Quota-2, 248.
8 0
3 years ago
Write a sentence comparing an executive order to a law.
coldgirl [10]
An executive order is a legally binding order that is given by the American President to direct federal agencies to carry out some specific action in their execution of Congressionally adopted laws and policies. Whereas a law is a piece of legislation that has been agreed to by Congress. 
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me out w this<br> thanks:)<br> its d.
    11·1 answer
  • All of the following are loopholes in the current federal election law except
    15·1 answer
  • What important government actions came from early earth day celebrations?
    15·1 answer
  • The civil war halted railroad construction in many states
    15·1 answer
  • How did Royal colonies differ from proprietary colonies?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the significant technological breakthrough that occurred during the Paleolithic era
    5·2 answers
  • What impact did Harriet Tubman have on history?
    9·2 answers
  • What are the ways in which Native Americans told their stories?
    10·1 answer
  • Pls help me plsssssssssssss
    9·1 answer
  • What kind of Cultural, Geographic, and Historical differences have
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!