The effect that the Gero Crucifix had on Medieval German art would be how uniquely it portrays Christ in it such that it serves a monumental work of Christ compared to its earliest depictions before. It focused more on the image of the 'suffering Christ' on the cross.
Four incidents arousing anti-Spain sentiment in the United States:<span>the explosion of the Maine
anti-Spain newspaper stories
distribution of propaganda against Spain
a letter from the Spanish ambassador</span>
The difference is that Roosevelt was ready to do more to
solve the problems brought about by the Great Depression while Hoover was more
hesitant to let government intervene.
The programs he launched such as the National Credit Corporation, the
Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and the Emergency Relief and Construction
Act <span>came late to
do any good. Upon assuming office,
Roosevelt quickly launched various programs to solve the problems. In the end, Roosevelt was right in his
approach of Government intervention because at the time, people needed support to uplift their lives.</span>
Answer:
The separation of the little children from their mothers
Explanation:
The Armenian genocide was performed in multiple steps and by using multiple different methods. The Armenians were systemically killed, mostly the men, dispersed throughout the country and put to live in the most inhospitable places, being separated from their families etc. The most terrible feature though from the genocide, according to Henry Wood but also by many others, was the separation of the infants and very little children from their mothers. They were taken away and moved into areas far away, never to be able to get in touch again, and this kind of cruelty was really monstrous from the Ottomans.
Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
