Answer:
Check explanation
Explanation:
Complete the sentences with can/can't
A. He CAN make biscuits.
b. He CAN'T play the violin. He CAN play the guitar.
c. Mickey CAN make paintings.
d. Bob CAN cook delicious kangreburguers.
e. They CAN'T cook alone but they CAN cook with their mother.
f. Donald CAN drive a car.
g. They CAN swim.
h. He CAN'T sing. He has a terrible voice! .........
i. He CAN speak German.
The discussion technique that Jennifer uses most clearly in this conversation is, challenging assumptions.
When we want to give a discussion a different approach, we use this technique through What if... questions, it is necessary to present another alternative to respond to things that we already established.
The other techniques are very different from this one, promoting participation would be mostly used by a moderator not a regular participant in the conversation, MAking an objective is to land the discussion into something real, and Asking for rhetorical questions does expect any kind of answer which we do have in here, therefore the other three options are incorrect.
Answer:
The Greasers?
Explanation:
I think the only "gang" in the outsiders is the greasers could be wrong though
Answer:
C. Section 55 - Her mind was still on the ball. His mind was on work the next day.
Explanation:
As one of Maupassant's themes is the "differences between men and women", we see that option C is the only reference that actually shows the contrast.
The above option which shows the contrast is actually referring to the differences between a man and a woman. In option C, we see that "Her mind was still on the ball" and while "His mind was on work the next day".
The reference tends to show the difference mindsets the man and the woman have.