In the "A Nation of Immigrants" and "Immigration Vs. Food Supply" sections of "Lifeboat Ethics," Garrett Hardin argues that immi
gration damages prosperous countries like the United States. Does the author present adequate evidence to support this argument? Why or why not? 30 POINTS
I think the author does not present adequate evidence to support his argument. This is because all he wrote was a scenarios that he can envision given the circumstances. There are no accurate data given like statistics, transcriptions, or even bills or laws that supports his views. All I can glean is that these are suppositions that may or may not be true given the circumstances it is presented with.
Waterways were among humanities first major transport routes. Whereas oceans acted as barriers in ancient times, in modern times they have been highways of travel and trade.