Answer:
quasi vertical integration
Explanation:
Quasi vertical integration is the vertical integration in which there is ownership by one firm i.e. downstream that closed to point where consumption ends or the upstream where the specialized tool and equipment are used
Also the firm that controls has a strong position but it is less as compared with the real vertical integration
Therefore according to the given situation, the second option is correct
Answer:
Always and less
Explanation:
Strategy: The strategy is a plan to do something with respect to achieve the company objectives or individual objective
Without preparing the strategy no one could accomplish their target.
For frequency and magnitude of other bargainer concessions, the strategy should always be reciprocatinvg and found to be more effectove as if concessions are obtained from other bargainer that involves less reciprocation
activities. In this chapter, you will learn about these two important management activities. ... To implement organizational change, managers must work to overcome that resistance ... Second, Kane's salespeople were.
Answer:
The best example I can think of that would integrate all of these concepts is when a business is looking to finance some sort of project and they are seeking financing either through the issuance of bonds or a loan from a bank. Some of the concepts would be important to both parties, while others would be more important to one than the other.
Cash Flow
This would be important to both parties. The business, to make sure they have enough cash flow to pay for the financing. And the financiers, for the same reason.
Ratio Analysis
This would be important to both parties for the same reason as above. Especially the "current ratio" (current assets / current liabilities) and the "working capital" ratio (current assets - current liabilities).
Financial Statements
This would be of most importance to the financiers. They would want to see the total picture of a company's financial strength.
Time Value of Money
This would be of most importance to the company itself. They would want to know if the project was worth the total amount they would be paying on the bonds or the loan
Answer:
$880.31
Explanation:
For computing the new price of the bond we need to apply the present value formula i.e to be shown in the attachment
Given that,
Assuming Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 8.6% ÷ 2 = 4.3%
NPER = 8 years × 2 =
PMT = $1,000 × 6.5% ÷ 2 = $32.5
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after applying the above formula, the present value is $880.31
