1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
12

What valid reasoning and sufficient evidence did Sojourner Truth argue in "Ain't I a Woman"?

English
1 answer:
4vir4ik [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

On May 29, 1851, Sojourner Truth, an abolitionist and former slave, gave one of history’s most memorable speeches on the intersection between women’s suffrage and black rights. Speaking to the Ohio Women’s Convention, Truth used her identity to point out the ways in which both movements were failing black women. Over and over, according to historical transcripts, she demanded, “Ain’t I a woman?”

It’s a question that continues to resonate with black women today—167 years later.

Born into slavery as Isabella Bomfree in 1797, Truth was sold four times before she finally fled her captor in New York state and found refuge with a nearby abolitionist family, who bought her freedom. Once she moved to New York City in 1828, Truth became a powerful preacher and campaigned on the issues of women’s suffrage and black rights. She renamed herself Sojourner Truth in 1843, declaring that God had called on her to preach the truth.

It was an aptly chosen name, as illustrated by her speech, in which she at once refutes the prevailing myth that women are weaker than men while challenging social definitions of womanhood—which relies upon ideas about white women’s femininity and purity. Truth says:

That man over there says that women need to be helped into carriages, and lifted over ditches, and to have the best place everywhere. Nobody ever helps me into carriages, or over mud-puddles, or gives me any best place! And ain’t I a woman? Look at me! Look at my arm! I have ploughed and planted, and gathered into barns, and no man could head me!

Truth criticizes her feminist contemporaries for focusing on the lived experiences of white women. Then she takes aim at the abolitionist movement for solely focusing on the rights of black men:

Then that little man in black there, he says women can’t have as much rights as men, ‘ cause Christ wasn’t a woman! Where did your Christ come from? Where did your Christ come from? From God and a woman! Man had nothing to do with Him.

The speech was particularly poignant as it was delivered at a time, as historian Nell Painter puts it, “when most Americans thought of slaves as male and women as white.” Truth “embodied a fact that still bears repeating: Among blacks are women; among the women, there are blacks.”

Truth’s speech has since taken on a life of its own, inspiring contemporary scholars ranging from black feminist bell hooks, who titled her 1981 book Ain’t I a woman? to black legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, who coined the term “intersectionality.” In a 2016 essay, Crenshaw draws parallels between the women’s suffrage and modern feminist movement, noting: “When feminist theory and politics that claim to reflect women’s experiences and women’s aspirations do not include or speak to black women, black women must ask, “Ain’t we women?”

It’s possible that Truth never have actually asked the rhetorical question that has come to define her. There are differing transcripts of the speech. Frances Gage, the president of the women’s convention, wrote the most famous transcript. Though Gage was present during the speech, she didn’t record it until 12 years later. Gage wrote the speech with a Southern dialect, though Sojourner never lived in the South. A reporter who was also present at the speech recorded the speech differently—without the rhetorical question “Ain’t I a woman?”—though the essence of Truth’s message remained the same.

Regardless of which transcript is accurate, there’s no denying that Truth’s rhetorical question remains as relevant today as it did in 1851. Last year, more than 1,500 people joined the “Ain’t I A Woman” march in Sacramento. The black women’s rights march was organized in response to the “the overwhelming whiteness” of the Women’s March in Washington in the aftermath of US president Donald Trump’s election, and to highlight the multitude of issues black women face. The power evident in such gatherings calls to mind the concluding words of Truth’s speech: “If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back , and get it right side up again! And now they is asking to do it, the men better let them.”

You might be interested in
During a collaborative discussion, Ellen said "I hated this story. I never want to read anything by this author again." What mig
lawyer [7]

Answer:

They generate new thinking and/or a more in-depth understanding of a desired outcome, e.g. a solution to a problem, a definition of a shared process.

Explanation:

A collaborative conversation is a purposeful, outcome-driven conversation aimed at building on each other's ideas

4 0
3 years ago
Since you’ve been gone and I finished the book what is the subordinate clause for the sentence
alexandr1967 [171]
I finished the book on time
8 0
3 years ago
"Heel" and "random turn pattern" are examples of using precise vocabulary and terms in “how to” articles.
kap26 [50]
Where is the question?
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does the sentence contain a pronoun agreement error? After anyone eats Yzma's famous chili, they swear to never try another kind
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

Yes.  There is an agreement error between 'anyone' (a singular pronoun) and 'their'  (a plural pronoun).

Explanation:

Some ways to fix the error ....

After <em><u>anyone</u></em> eats Yzma's famous chili, <em><u>he or she swears</u></em> to never try another kind.

OR

After <u><em>people</em></u> eat Yzma's famous chili, <em><u>they swear </u></em>to never try another kind.

By the way, there is another error in the sentence !!!!!!

NO:   'to never try'

YES:   'never to try'

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not a purpose of a dictionary?
Kryger [21]
The purpose of the dictionary is all of the above EXCEPT to eliminate dialect and slang.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read the excerpt from Le Morte d’Arthur by Sir Thomas Malory.
    15·1 answer
  • What are some of the things that hikers might have to contend with
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these excerpts from the poems you read is an example of personification?
    13·1 answer
  • Read the stanza from Langston Hughes's poem "I, Too, Sing America."
    12·1 answer
  • Jefferson believed that propagating a church by requiring attendance or monetary support was a form of _______.
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone help me on this I need help so bad ​
    12·1 answer
  • Please help 100 words max
    12·1 answer
  • What does the Prince's castellated abbey represent?
    14·2 answers
  • What is the obligation of the individual in times of inhumanity?
    6·1 answer
  • Based on context clues, which meaning of the word trace is most likely used
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!