Answer:
c
Explanation:
iron triangles and advocacy interest groups
Answer:
<em>The correct option is C) Evaluating the argument and forming a conclusion based on the evidence.</em>
Explanation:
An important step in critical thinking is evaluating the argument being made. The claim put forward by Sarah has no evidence and is a general statement made by Wikipedia. Of course, the emotions of every person present on Earth cannot be surveyed and the claim is made without proper evidence.
Jake's claim is based on evaluation of the argument and lack of evidence by Sarah and hence, it is an element of critical thinking.
Answer:
Eleanor Gibson was an American experimental psychologist
Explanation:
Eleanor Gibson was an American experimental psychologist whose famous works includes her study of depth perception theory on how children perceive their environment.
Eleanor stumbled on the virtual cliff discovery in one of her experiment that involves raising rats in the dark on a virtual cliff made of a sheet of glass with patterned paper, an experiment initially meant to get more use out of dark-reared rats. The dark-reared having presumed to have lost perception in the dark, was expected to walk indiscriminately on the near and far sides of the cliff. However, to her surprise the dark-reared rats chose the near side, and consistently avoided the glass-covered drop-off portion of the cliff. This shows the dark-reared rats which have not had any previous experience about depth could perceive depth. Gibson later on tested this experience on other animals. She also tested it on human babies using the presence of the mother to initiate crawling. The babies were also found to perceive depth on the cliff without a prior knowledge or experience of such.
The French and British governments feared that if the Ottoman Empire collapsed the Russian Empire would gain control of the Black Sea, and the Bosphorus Straits. This wold allow the Russian Empire access to the Med. ... These idealist from France and England fought for the Greeks against the Ottomans for democracy.
The statement that non-critical thinkers generally adopt beliefs without thoughtful scrutiny or rigorous evaluation, letting these beliefs drift into their thinking for all sorts of superficial and illogical reasons is true.
Critical thinkers on the other hand analyze and evaluate all the available information, develop their own well-reasoned beliefs, and recognize when they don't have sufficient information to arrive at well-reasoned beliefs.
