The experimenter conducts the statistical analyses and finds that participants in the experimental condition (i.e., those who co
nsumed 3 alcoholic beverages) reported more positive emotions than did participants in the neutral condition (i.e., those consumed 3 non-alcoholic beverages). Importantly, this observed difference in emotional responses surpassed the threshold for significance (p <.05). 1. Given this evidence, the researcher should accept the null hypothesis. A. True • B. False C. Not enough information .
2. Given this evidence, the researcher should reject the null hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
3. Given this evidence, the researcher should accept the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information . . .
4. Given this evidence, the researchers should reject the alternative hypothesis. A. True B. False C. Not enough information .
Given that the difference surpasses the threshold level it means the experiment is highly significant according to statistics a p-value less than 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05) is statistically significant.
This shows that the null hypothesis is less than a 5% probability correct and the alternative is more than 95% correct.
Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis, and accept the alternative hypothesis as the correct hypothesis
Change Blindness is a psychological phenomenon in which a person skips the change in visual stimulus. When the instructor was busy in giving the lecture, he did not notice that several students have left the room and were not attentive to the lecture. This is an example of change blindness.
