First you will need to find the lateral idea which is
2(15) (3.14) (4)
-multiply them together
Then you will need to find the base.
-3.14x15x4
Then find the surface area
-answer from lateral area and 2(-answer from base-)
Add that and that is ur answer
Benjamin is correct about the diameter being perpendicular to each other and the points connected around the circle.
<h3>
Inscribing a square</h3>
The steps involved in inscribing a square in a circle include;
- A diameter of the circle is drawn.
- A perpendicular bisector of the diameter is drawn using the method described as the perpendicular of the line sector. Also known as the diameter of the circle.
- The resulting four points on the circle are the vertices of the inscribed square.
Alicia deductions were;
Draws two diameters and connects the points where the diameters intersect the circle, in order, around the circle
Benjamin's deductions;
The diameters must be perpendicular to each other. Then connect the points, in order, around the circle
Caleb's deduction;
No need to draw the second diameter. A triangle when inscribed in a semicircle is a right triangle, forms semicircles, one in each semicircle. Together the two triangles will make a square.
It can be concluded from their different postulations that Benjamin is correct because the diameter must be perpendicular to each other and the points connected around the circle to form a square.
Thus, Benjamin is correct about the diameter being perpendicular to each other and the points connected around the circle.
Learn more about an inscribed square here:
brainly.com/question/2458205
#SPJ1
Answer:
We have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses testing procedure in the given scenario is
H0: Husband’s perception would be similar to the wife’s i.e. μh=μw
Ha: Husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s i.e. μh>μw
Level of significance: α=0.05
Test statistic: t=2.776
Critical region: t>t(0.05,9)=1.833
Conclusion: As the calculated value of t lies in critical region, so we reject our null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. Thus, we have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
2,150 estimated would be 2,000. Since she flies there and back multiply 2,000 by 2. Since she flies it twice multiply 4,000 by 2. Estimated: 8,000 miles. To find the exact miles Do the same thing but with 2,150: 2,150 times 2 = 4,300. 4,300 times 2 = 8,600. She flies exactly 8,600 miles per year :)
