1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
loris [4]
3 years ago
10

If chris is on trial and does not want to testify in court, what would happen to chris?

Law
1 answer:
sertanlavr [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

He will be hold in contempt of the law court. And contempt against the law court charge is punishable by jail or fine, or both

Explanation:

Chris is said to be served with subpoena. A subpoena means that the law court want you to provide information concerning a subject matter. A subpoena ad testificandum requires you to testify in court, at a deposition, or to some other legal authority. A subpoena duces tecum requires you to produce documents or tangible evidence.

Chris will be charged to be in contempt of the law court. But if Chris did not was to testify because of self incrimination, with the help of a experienced criminal defense attorney, Chris might use the fifth amendment right.

You might be interested in
What type of system does Brazil have?<br> Unitary,<br> Federal,or <br> Confederal? *civics*
kumpel [21]
Federal as the picture says in bold it is federal.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List examples of god-given and constitutional rights african americans were waiting for?
qwelly [4]

Answer: Abused and scorned though we may be, our List examples of God-given and constitutional rights African Americans were waiting for? (Brain / Notes) -The right to be equal -The right to vote -The right to be free to make choices about how to conduct their own lives as long as they do not interfere with the liberty of god given rights

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What accurate conclusion can you say about necessary and proper clause ?
goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer:

necessary to balance proper exercise of the power

Explanation:

The term "Necessary and Proper Clause" was coined by Associate Justice Louis Brandeis in 1926. It is universally adopted by the courts in United States. It is also known as the "Elastic clause".

Necessary and Proper Clause: Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution

"The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof".

The clause gained prominence after Supreme Court's decision in <em>Lambert v. Yellowley </em>case. The court ruled in favor of restricting medicinal use of alcohol under the 18th Amendment. It was deemed necessary to balance proper exercise of the power.

It is a unique clause in American Constitution as it gives no absolute authority to any law rather it can be amended considering the seriousness of the situation. It makes the Constitution more flexible as well as a method to deal cases with immediate concerns.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Est ce que le droit extra patrimonial est évaluable ene somme d’argent ?
Mkey [24]

Answer:

Je le pense

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
True or False? Police coldly and strictly uphold the law, ignoring their emotional and personal judgement.
tresset_1 [31]
In most cases, yes, they can’t let their emotions blind them from what has to be done, if they be bias then they could be fired or that one person could commit another crime. That’s why police are so cold.

Hope this clears things up

✨SammySilkWorm waz here✨

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are some of the weaknesses in bureaucracies?
    15·1 answer
  • Kathy Hathcoat was a teller at a bank in Pendleton, Indiana. Her branch manager, Mary Jane Cooper, caught Hathcoat stealing mone
    7·1 answer
  • The penalties for a person's third DUI conviction include imprisonment for
    12·1 answer
  • Ordinarily, to obtain an arrest warrant, a law enforcement agent must demonstrate that there is ______ that a suspect committed
    12·1 answer
  • What are concurrent powers? Provide an example of a power that is concurrent.
    11·2 answers
  • Someone please help!!!!<br><br>What is the supreme law of the land?<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the first step in the writing process? drafting refining prewriting researching
    10·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·2 answers
  • Should cereal be considered a soup?!?​
    5·1 answer
  • Is swearing bad? Or broke the law
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!