Answer:
<em>The correct option is C) Evaluating the argument and forming a conclusion based on the evidence.</em>
Explanation:
An important step in critical thinking is evaluating the argument being made. The claim put forward by Sarah has no evidence and is a general statement made by Wikipedia. Of course, the emotions of every person present on Earth cannot be surveyed and the claim is made without proper evidence.
Jake's claim is based on evaluation of the argument and lack of evidence by Sarah and hence, it is an element of critical thinking.
It revolves around <span>challenge an orthodox position concerning historical explanation. Historical explanations often designed in such a way that always favor the one who live to tell the tell. E.h carr's on the other hand pointed out that the version given by so called 'winenrs' in the history often does not reflect the truth.
</span>
<h2>Answer</h2>
A) Overriding a presidential reversal or veto.
<h3>Explanation</h3>
In order to maintain the prevalence over check and balance is that the congress must ensure that powers of presidency aren't misused and put to wrong use. Therefore establishing that the congress has enough powers to study whether or not has the decision taken correct. Power of reversal or veto allows credibility to prevail and optimal decisions to take place and be implemented.
Lo voy a enviar a través de comentarios
