1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
14

Why does diderot believe that knowledge should be collected and shared among all people?

History
1 answer:
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Diderot believed knowledge should be collected and shared among all people because " knowledge is power , it helps to improve oneself ". If it is not collected and shared among people ,people will remain ignorant.Ignorance leads to disaster and it is danger to ordinary people.This answer is correct because it explains the benefits of knowledge and what happens without it</span>
You might be interested in
What sorts of paths do you follow to reach happiness? How long does that happiness last?
myrzilka [38]

do stuff you love to do. If you do stuff you don't like or hate, it will be tough. Then you have to lie to people saying stuff you don't like. It will be hard, and it will last forever if you keep it on the right path.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement reflects the structural-functional approach to the issue of gender roles?
fgiga [73]
I'd say <span>A. Gender roles result in unequal distribution of power.
</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened after the Battle of Gonzales?
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:

Castaneda did not want a fight: he was under orders to avoid one if possible and may have sympathized with the Texans in terms of states' rights. He retreated to San Antonio, having lost one man killed in action.

Explanation:

this is what i found

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
why might rulers of command and socailist economies see market-oriented reforms as a threat to their leadership
AlexFokin [52]

The reason why the leaders of the countries with command and socialist economies would see the market economies as a threat to their leadership is because they will lose the power they have over the production, the land, the resources, the laborers.

In a market economy, pretty much everything is privately owned, and the government can only be regulating things in accordance to the law, but can not control the profit and the work of the companies. In a command or socialist economy, the leader of the country has total control over everything, thus controlling the whole profit of the country and how everything will be done, so by allowing a market economy, the leader will be directly affected with losing a lot of power from his hands.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s seemed to be relationship between the GDP in the United States during the last half of 1998 and the first of 1999?
BigorU [14]
Https://ourworldindata.org/economic-growth the graph on this page shows a constant growth in the periods stated
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who votes in elections senator’s?
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Which branch of government has the most detail outlined in the Constitution? Why do you think
    13·1 answer
  • During the 19th century, the United States ability to remain isolated from European affairs was largely due to its
    12·1 answer
  • A process that directly describes the growth of cities is
    7·2 answers
  • One potential congressional tool for ending a war is cutting funding for the war. negotiating peace treaties. replacing the secr
    12·2 answers
  • What age did rafael trujillo join the national guard?
    13·1 answer
  • What American Indian groups lived inland from the Northeast coast in approximately 1500?
    8·1 answer
  • What's an impact of automation?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the impact of world war in indian economy
    9·1 answer
  • What did Thomas Watson believe about the following:
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!