Answer: by putting restrictions that limit behaviours that may interfer with other people right or with even your own right
Explanation:
Restrictions or restrictive rules are put forward to monitor each right and make it fall in line with what is acceptable standard of behaviour for example every person has a right to drive at a particular age but still they have to follow road rules in order to be safe and limit their speed or any unacceptable behaviour on the road but also to ensure that others around them are safe.
<span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
</span><span /></span>an oligarchy is best defined as a government ruled by a small, elite group
A persons record has alot to do with it. They normally consider the severity of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. Some crimes put a person ineligible for bail. A persons record is another consideration. Someone who has a long record may be subject to bigger bail amounts, if any at all. Another thing, if a problematic person has tendencies for being late to court, or not showing up at all. Judges have been know to look at a persons family life and employment status. A persons reputation can really count. I hope this has given you enough information.
The answer would be Situational Leadership in which the followers maturity increase and thus the behavior of the leader would be less structured thus would require less socio emotional support. The Situational Leadership model is produced by Paul Hersey as well as Ken Blanchard also.
