1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
13

In which of the following circumstances, under the doctrine of stare decisis, does the common law rule stated in an earlier judg

ment not apply to a present case?
A. Only when the case concerns a government agency.
B. Only when the court distinguishes the earlier decision.
C. Only when the parties involved jointly appeal to the courts to do so.
D. The doctrine of stare decisis does not allow this kind of a situation.
Law
1 answer:
Rudik [331]3 years ago
7 0
D because the doctrine of state decisions
You might be interested in
Outer layer of cells covering an organism
FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

cell wall

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Que es centralizacion
ANEK [815]
La concentración de control de una actividad u organización bajo una sola autoridad
4 0
3 years ago
Any evidence uncovered in an investigation can be used in court.<br>true or false
Sedaia [141]
The correct answer is true
3 0
3 years ago
What is a potential disadvantage of plea bargains?
PIT_PIT [208]

The primary potential disadvantage of plea bargain is 'more negative publicity for defendants'.

Option d.

<u>Explanation: </u>

The main drawback of plea bargaining is that innocent persons can indeed be punished. To counter this issue, in 1982, in order to limit the number of plea deals, in California voters decided to initiate amendment 8, so that innocent individuals did not feel obliged to take part in the trial.

An innocent person can accept a plea deal to decrease his or her loss. This means they're going to have a criminal record. Serving time in prison could be requested. Fines or refunds may be payable.  

8 0
3 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Among other skills and attributes, attorneys should excel in critical thinking skills; communication skills such as listening, r
    12·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Group of answer choices reaffirmed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson
    15·1 answer
  • Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in up to 70% of deaths
    8·2 answers
  • HELPPP ANSWER THISSSSS PLS ITS DUE TODAY PLS PLS PLS PLS I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTTT
    7·2 answers
  • Parking in front of a fire hydrant <br> A. Moving Violation<br><br> B. Non-Moving Violation
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these is an economic benefit of the federal minimum wage law?
    15·2 answers
  • 5.1.4 quiz: What is the primary goal of interest groups?
    12·1 answer
  • Vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a victim's right?
    7·1 answer
  • If a state decides to sue another state over immigration sanctuary laws, which court would most likely handle the case first?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!