Answer:
A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case. ... There are also a small number of special circumstances in which the Supreme Court is required by law to hear an appeal.
Answer:
Provides citizens with benefits for following a policy: Incentive
calls on citizens' morality or decency to obey a policy: Hortatory
creates stiff penalties/fines to force citizens to adjust to policy: Authoritative
grants training to citizens who want to follow a policy but can't: Capacity
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
There is really never too much cats or dogs. It depends on a person's opinion.
Explanation:
If you don't like cats then one cat is to much. Same for dogs. It all depends on the person's opinion.
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
The correct answer is c. Jail term
