#1- The chart shows an increase over each decade. This means it is option B. We can come to this conclusion by looking at the rise of the dates and population number.
#2- The chart shows a dramatic increase. By eliminating all of the other options due to the fact everything increased and not the opposite, the answer must be B. We can also look at the left side of the chart to see the number of people living in New York increasing by more than two million.
#3- The picture clearly shows the idea that urbanization led to more Americans who preferred city living in the 1800s. We know from the charts that more people moved to New York during the 1800s, we can also see a lot of buildings in the picture. This leads me to conclude the answer must be B.
#4- Looking at the picture I believe the answer is A. I do not see the difference between residential or business areas, the water level, or the amount of trade being conducting. This leads me to conclude that A is the only correct option.
#5- I do not know this answer due to the lack of readable context and the fact that I do not take your course. I would need a date.
I hope my time and effort suffices your quench for knowledge. Have an amazing day and never stop learning! :)
The answer to this is letter D.) It led groups within empires to fight for their political independence. This era sparked lots of revolutions and upheavals against empires; different countries conquered by big empires united and strove to fight for freedom.
While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
