He thought that the act should not exist because it restricts the power of unions and the people's right to unionize. He went as far as to call it a "slave-labor bill", when he vetoed it in 1947. He also argued that it was against building a democratic society and that the bill was unconstitutional because it limited free speech.
At the time there were a lot of advancements being made in the textile industry; therefore increased the demand for slave labour. What the cotton gin did was it made picking cotton a much quicker process, and this led slave-owners. So the cotton INCREASED a demand for slave labour because it make cotton-picking much more profitable. So the answer for your question is C :) I hope this helped you xx
Answer:
A. increased work opportunities
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
