1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
torisob [31]
3 years ago
11

Public policy concerning the Colorado River affects all of the following states EXCEPT which one?

Social Studies
2 answers:
gogolik [260]3 years ago
8 0
Public policy concerning the Colorado River affects all of the following states except New Mexico. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "c".

Private organizations that are created to raise and distribute campaign money to the candidates for political office are called Political Action Committees. The correct option is option "a".
Vlad [161]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

New Mexico

political action committees

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Help me with this question please
Gemiola [76]

Since it lives in full light of the sun, it is considered luminous and shares characteristics with air and fire. Through its detachment from earth it represents spirit and soul. Dante has called the eagle of 'bird of God', while Jung defines it merely as height.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was not an Allied Power?
Phoenix [80]
Italy was not an allied power rather it was an axis power as it was a fascist state
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many times has the<br> Georgia Constitution been<br> written? I need a number
8090 [49]

Answer: 3

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
2 years ago
What are two of the categories of people found in cities
kvasek [131]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

People of various categories are found in cities, out of which 'Upper Class' and 'Lower Class' are two of the categories.

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

There are a number of categories in which an urban population is divided.

The category with the highest income and highest spending capacity is called 'Upper Class. The category with medium levels of income and expenditure is called the 'Middle Class'. The lowest of all categories is the 'Lower Class' which consists of people that have extremely low income and thus, a very low spending capacity.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some environmental regulations (like forbidding the burning of coal in cities) benefit each and every one of us because the air
    14·1 answer
  • One who spreads ideas to help an institution is known as a
    7·1 answer
  • What is the term for people with similar concerns who work together to achieve certain goals
    9·1 answer
  • 1. The difference between role strain and role conflict is that role strain is about the competing demands imposed by __________
    6·1 answer
  • 3 responsibilities of an American citizen
    9·1 answer
  • Is a township the smallest unit in local government?
    5·1 answer
  • What accounts for the fall in Native American population after 1492?
    7·2 answers
  • 16. Research on the relationship between personality and job performance indicates a. people who are extraverted perform slightl
    12·1 answer
  • What effect did President Reagan expect his economic policies to have on America?  A.  The national government would take in mor
    11·2 answers
  • Which section of a manuscript discusses the general types of data analyses that were planned and used in the study?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!