The red liquid rises when the temperature gets warmer and falls when the temperature gets colder
Answer:
It takes into account people's overlapping identities and experiences to understand the complexity of the prejudices they face.
In other words, the affirmative intersectional theory that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other markers of identity. Intersectionality recognizes that identity markers (eg, "feminine" and "black") do not exist identified by each other, and each of the information to the others, often creating a complex convergence of oppression.
Explanation:
Today, intersectionality is considered crucial for social equity work. Activists and community organizations are asking for and participating in more dynamic conversations about differences in experience between people with different overlapping identities. Without an intersectional lens, events and movements that aim to address injustice toward one group can end up perpetuating systems of inequities towards other groups. Intersectionality fully informs YW Boston's work, by encouraging nuanced conversations about inequality in Boston. It illuminates us about health disparities among women of color, provides avenues for our youth leaders to understand identity, and is crucial to the advocacy work we support.
Answer:
So they could go through to Asia. They didn't know how far the Americas were from Asia.
As regards if it is false that class conflict has resulted in revolution in modern industrial societies, this is True.
<h3>Have there been revolutions due to class conflict?</h3><h3 />
Even though many predicted that there would be revolutions as a result of class conflicts, this hasn't been the case.
What has been seen however, is that industrial societies have continued to thrive and come up with methods to reduce class conflicts.
Find out more on class conflicts at brainly.com/question/24769299.
Answer:
b. did not initially cover all categories of workers.
Explanation:
The American Social Security System was very different from what we know today, in its early years of establishment, during the New Deal. The main difference was that it did not cover all professional categories (which made it different from the European pension system). Professional categories were included in this system as the US economic condition strengthened through other New Deal reforms. This happened little by little, until it became what we know today.