Mainly to prevent every other country from attacking them, instead of supporiting them in wars
The Partition of India was the process of dividing the subcontinent along sectarian lines, which took place in 1947 as India gained its independence from the British Raj<span>. The northern, predominantly Muslim sections of India became the nation of </span>Pakistan<span>, while the southern and majority Hindu section became the Republic of </span>India<span>.</span>
It was a form of American foreign policy to further it's aims in Latin America and east Asia through use of its economic power by guaranteeing loans made to foreign countries
I’d say some countries had an easier time with shifting independence because of who was at the helm of there leadership and what advantages they were given weather it comes to land, trade or power overall. In Africa it would’ve been much harder to obtain political stability for new countries because of the colonization that had hurt many African countries and had made them give up many young people and loose many smart individual minds that could lead there country. It honestly depends on the circumstances that many leaders were put into mamut leaders from impoverished nations couldn’t really control what they were given and couldn’t do much with what to fix because of the amount that was taken from them, while leaders in rich countries would be able to have more control and power to work with so the more resources you have the more the leader can actually begin to do activities that can either help or hurt there country depending on what there type of government is.