1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergeinik [125]
3 years ago
8

How did the transatlantic slave trade affect the African population?

History
2 answers:
Ray Of Light [21]3 years ago
8 0
C is correct because during this time many of the men would fight back, and were more useful since they were stronger.
kompoz [17]3 years ago
7 0
The answer would be C (the population was mostly me since they could resist the Europeans.
You might be interested in
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLEIST 20 PTS
AlekseyPX

Hello Bunny Pop! 


Here is your answer


When the United States entered World War I in 1917, Germans were the single largest ethnic group in Minnesota. Nativism during this period was a “patriotic” attitude that saw recent immigrants—particularly those of German descent— as potentially traitorous. Many felt that because German Americans shared their heritage with the Kaiser and the German Empire, they would side with the enemy power. That many German Americans advocated neutrality until the U.S. declared war was further proof of disloyalty to nativists.

The most conspicuous nativist agency was the Minnesota Commission of Public Safety (MCPS). Created by the state legislature in April of 1917, the MCPS was a seven-person commission headed by Governor J. A. A. Burnquist. It was given near-dictatorial powers to support the war effort at home and root out disloyal elements. While much of the commission’s activity focused on attacking labor advocates and political dissenters in the Nonpartisan League and the Industrial Workers of the World, the MCPS kept a close watch on German Americans as well. There was, in fact, much cross-over between these two groups, since many German Americans were both socialists and pacifists.

The MCPS took drastic action in dealing with a gathering in New Ulm on July 25, 1917. The meeting was organized by Brown County Auditor Louis Vogel, Mayor Dr. Louis Fritsche, and city attorney Albert Pfaender. Its agenda was to discuss the constitutionality of the draft. The MCPS and its agents already suspected Pfaender and Fritsche of sedition. A month later, Burnquist had them both deposed.

Another victim of the July 25 rally was Adolph Ackermann, president of Dr. Martin Luther College. During the demonstration, he gave a speech questioning the government’s motive for entering the war. In response to his comments, the MCPS coerced the college to force Ackermann’s resignation.

Nativism sometimes served personal and business interests. After Fritsche was removed from office, the MCPS pressured the State Medical Society and the Brown–Redwood County Society to revoke the ex-mayor’s medical certification. Two doctors on the review panel who voted against Fritsche ran practices in Springfield, a town in keen business competition with New Ulm. Fritsche was eventually exonerated.

Another vested-interest case unfolded in Springfield, where mostly German American stakeholders proposed creating a new bank. The president of the existing State Bank of Springfield submitted the names of those stakeholders to the MCPS to investigate their loyalty.

Some members of the Catholic Church also stood to benefit from anti-German policies. Archbishop John Ireland had long promoted the “Americanization” of the Church. During the war, this attitude gained ground. The archbishop urged that English should be the only language of church liturgy—a move that alienated German Catholics and their clergy, who conducted mass in German. This division allowed many Irish Catholics to assume leadership positions at the expense of their German counterparts.

The German-language press was an obvious target. The MCPS kept a close eye on many of these publications. Albert Steinhauser, publisher of the New Ulm Post and the New Ulm Review, featured many German articles in his papers that criticized the war. Under pressure from the commission, he was arrested and expelled from the Minnesota State Editorial Association in 1918. Even more severe, federal authorities jailed Volkszeitung editor Frederick W. Bergmeier of St. Paul for the duration of the war.

German Minnesotans responded to nativism in different ways. While many spoke their minds and suffered, others kept quiet and out of sight. Some became vehement and vocal “patriots” or “100% Americans” in order to deflect suspicion. A few even spied on other Germans for the MCPS. The replacements for both Fritsche and Pfaender were themselves German Americans. Bishop Busch, the stalwart “Americanizer,” was of Austrian stock.

The MCPS and other officials both represented and sanctioned a general culture of fear and hostility against German Americans. Such antagonism manifested itself throughout society at large. Indeed, many of the investigations conducted by the commission were petitioned by private citizens. This created a climate of paranoia and violence. Fritsche and his family, after his disgrace, lived in fear of their well-being and lives; this was by no means unusual for victims of nativism. Nativist Minnesotans boycotted their German neighbors’ stores, vandalized their property, and called for them to resign from their jobs.

When World War I ended, so did much of the MCPS’s justification. It was abolished by legislative act in 1919 and met for the last time in 1920. With the commission’s demise and the end of the war, anti-German nativism lost much of its momentum.


Hope this helps and answers your question. I wish you the best of luck! :) 

6 0
4 years ago
What was the northwest passage apex<br><br><br> answer :a passage on the sea through north america
Mila [183]

A passage on the sea through North America

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The balance of power in central and eastern europe was reshaped at the end of the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth ce
erastovalidia [21]
The Ottoman Empire is the answer hunny
3 0
3 years ago
Study the image of an 1897 advertisement. A United Fruit Company steamship line advertisement for a trip from Boston to Jamaica
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

took test on edg

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the spaces below, list two ways in which John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie were similar
Ulleksa [173]
<span>Consolidation and philanthropists. Both used systems of consolidation to increase their power and wealth. Carnegie used vertical consolidation meaning he bought companies that created all of the resources needed to create steel as well as raillines to move the steel. Rockefeller used hortizontal consolidation meaning he bought out rival companies until he owned all oil production in the country. Both men also used their wealth to give back to society. Carnegie donated money for libraries throughout the country as well as Carnegie Mellon University. Rockefeller donated to Rockefeller Center, the University of Chicago, and Rockefeller University. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please answer this for me :)
    6·2 answers
  • Why were the homeowners in new london fighting for private property rights?
    13·2 answers
  • 4. Explain the outcome of the Marbury v. Madison Case.
    13·1 answer
  • Why was George Washington forced to make camp at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania?
    6·2 answers
  • Who is the youngest undisputed heavyweight boxing champion of all times?
    7·2 answers
  • 2. What lead to the initial bloodshed? help me plz
    8·1 answer
  • A Sports Car in Space
    14·1 answer
  • What is the state motto of South Carolina?
    11·1 answer
  • Where do presidential candidates campaign the most
    14·1 answer
  • Write a report summarizing the circumstances and outcome of the Trent Affair
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!