Answer:
$114,100
Explanation:
Data provided:
corporation's net operating income = $11,500
FE Division's divisional segment margin = $80,100
GBI Division's divisional segment margin = $45,500
Now,
the total segment margin
= ( FE Division's divisional segment margin ) + ( GBI Division's divisional segment margin )
on substituting the respective values, we get
the total segment margin = $80,100 + $45,500 = $125,600
Thus,
the common fixed expense not traceable to the individual divisions will be calculated as:
= the total segment margin -corporation's net operating income
on substituting the respective values, we get
= $125,600 - $11,500
= $114,100
Answer:
b. transformational
Explanation:
Transformational leadership refers to the kind of leadership wherein a leader uses his appeal or charisma effectively to convey and convince his subordinates with respect to long term vision.
Transformational, as the word suggests refers to those leaders who are capable of transforming the approach of their subordinates owing to their charm and the reputation they have earned for themselves.
Such leaders are good at implementing organizational changes owing to their personality.
Answer:
This is a stratified random sample because a separate random sample is selected from each class
Explanation:
Stratified random sampling is an appropriate method when the population consists of mixed characteristics and you would like to ensure that every characteristic is proportionally represented in the sample. In this example, the population is the students from Central High School and the mixed characteristics are the different classes such as Freshman students, Sophomore students, Juniors and Seniors.
After the population is divided into subgroups based on characteristics, from the overall proportion of the population, you calculate how many people should be sampled in each subgroup. Random or systematic sampling can then be used to select a sample from each subgroup.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The investment A was more risky, but in general they were both pretty much a risk.
With both having a produced annual rates of return in under 10%
Reason for A being the riskier is that his annual rate of return in average was 8%, while B's annual rate was 9%
Difference may seem small, but for bigger investments 1% can be a deal breaker.