Answer: $0 equipment, $20,000 land, $30,000 inventory, $90,000 partnership interest.
Explanation: The asset basis in the partnership between Xena and Xavier is the same same their basis. In the scenario above, Xena's basis is the same as Xena's partnership basis in asset.
Xena's asset basis include;
Cash = $20,000
Land basis = $40,000
Inventory basis = $30,000
Equipment basis = $0
Therefore Xena's basis in the partnership interest :
$(20,000 + 40,000 + 30,000 + 0) = $90,000
Answer:
The value of the call option today is $7.73
Explanation:
The value or price of the call option under the two state model is calculated based on the assumption that there is no opportunity for arbitrage profit. The value of call option will be based on the return in case the call option is exercised and the probability of earning that return.
The strike price is $105
The return if price goes to $122 and option is exercised is 122 - 105 = $17
The return if the price goes down to $88 will be 0 as the call option will not be exercised.
Thus, the expected return is = 0.5 * 17 + 0.5 * 0 = $8.5
This return will be earned after 1 year. To calculate the value of the call option today, we need to discount this return to present value using the risk free rate.
V0 or value today = 8.5 / (1+0.1) = $7.727 rounded off to $7.73
They don't. Water was found and there are actually implications that if it doesn't exist nowadays, it might have historically existed long before there was even life on earth. There are theories that there was life on Mars millions of years ago way before earth had life.
Answer:
Ashley may not claim Candy as her dependant even if other requirements are met.
Explanation:
Ashley is single and lives with Barney, her boyfriend, and Candy, his 8-year-old daughter. Ashley paid all of the support for her household in 2018. Barney has earned income of $2,500 and had income tax withheld from his wages. He has no other income and is not required to file an income tax return. With one qualifying child, Barney may claim an earned income credit. Barney files an income tax return solely to obtain a refund of withheld income taxes and does not claim EIC. Because Barney does not have a filing requirement and filed only to obtain a refund of withheld income taxes, Candy is not considered the qualifying child of Barney or any other taxpayer
Based on the explanation given Ashley cannot claim Candy as an independent because of the tax payer rule. If other requirements are met, Ashley cannot claim Candy as dependent because the girl in question isn't her child . Moreover, Candy is the full responsibility of Barney. Candy is under Barney's care and is solely required by law to take care of her.