To attract customers to their store and not their more expensive competitors?
Answer: B.
Explanation: I would say B because they probably don't give two BLEEPS about an editor. And not C because it doesn't cost money to edit a entry.
Answer:
The effective rate of protection for the U.S. steel industry is approximately 17.5%
Explanation:
Mathematically, the effective rate of protection is calculated as follows;
e = (n-ab)/(1-a)
where n is the nominal tariff rate on the final product , a is the ratio of the value of the imported input to the value of the finished product and b is the nominal tariff rate on the imported input
Mathematically;
a = value of iron ore/value of steel = 100,00/500,000 = 1/5 = 0.2
From the question, we can see that nominal tariff rate for steel n = 15% = 15/100 = 0.15
The nominal rate for iron ore b = 5% = 5/100 = 0.05
So we substitute all of these into the equation of e above
e = {0.15-0.2(0.05)}/(1-0.2) = (0.15-0.01)/0.8 = 0.14/0.8 = 0.175 which is same as 17.5%
Answer:
A) fewer jobs will be created in the United States.
B) companies have increased organizational costs, including insurance costs.
C) there is less global trade.
Explanation:
When war and terrorism run rampant, there are a lot of economic sectors that would experience an increase in demand. Example of this would be tourism And hospitality industry. Nobody really want to have a vacation during wars. So this will made companies in this industry forced to cut off a lot of their employees.
During war, there are also a threat of attacks to the countries that might destroyed a lot of properties owned by the companies. This is why the insurance costs tend to be increased.
War and terrorism tend to resulted in several alliances between different countries. This also could make relationships between countries that previously act as trading partners became strained.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Modigliani and Miller or MM hypothesis states that dividend policy of a firm plays no role in the determination of the market value of it's stock or the market value of the firm.
As per the theory, dividend policy of a firm is irrelevant and does not affect the value of the firm.
The theory maintains that under specific set of assumptions, the capital structure of a firm and it's composition does not play any role in determining the value of a firm and no capital structure can be termed as optimal.
It further states, the value of a firm is determined by capitalizing it's expected return with the firm's average cost of capital. Also, a firm cannot change the total value of it's securities by splitting it's cash flows into different streams such as dividends or retained earnings.
A firm's value is determined by a firm's real assets and not by it's issued securities.
