I think it happened because president Hayes had a bad reputation at that time and the idea was, the congress should be stronger to "look at his hands".
I would say internationally i kind of dont get the question that is bieng asked
Answer:
The colonial responses to British policies after the French and Indian War can be classified as violent or nonviolent. Hence, we have
Non Violent responses to be the following
Committees of Correspondence: this was formed in 1764, and it was a means of a series of dialogue among patriot leaders throughout the American colonies. The purpose is to unite the colonies in opposition to the British Parliament. It is nonviolent in nature.
Non-Importation Movement: this was formed after the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Stamp Act of 1765. And it is a form of protest by the American colonists for the purpose of boycotting the British goods in an effort to change imperial policy. It involves the abstinence of the American colonists from purchasing or consuming imported tea and other goods. It is nonviolent in nature
Stamp Act Congress: which was conducted in 1765, was the first meeting of the representatives from various American colonies to conduct a unified protest against British taxation, including the petition of the king and Parliament for change the objectionable measures. It is nonviolent in nature
While the violent response is the
Boston Massacre: this occurred in the year 1770. And it was a street fight or open and physical confrontation involving the British soldiers shooting killing several people while being harassed by the American colonists' mob who chose to throw harmful objects like snowballs, stones, and sticks, towards the British soldiers in Boston.
Explanation:
The answer is a Filibuster.
Violating the Supremacy cause. This is a clause that is present in paragraph 2 of Article VI of the constitution of the US.
Hope this helps :)
Would you mark brainiest please, I am trying to get more points :)
