When a product is scarce, consumers are faced with conducting their own cost-benefit analysis; a product in high demand but low supply will likely be expensive. ... This means that a consumer should only purchase the product if they see a greater benefit from having the product than the cost associated with obtaining it.
From the given description, Chip is using an experimental design called (A) matching.
Matching <u>is a type of experimental design where the researcher divide his or her samples into two groups of treatment conditions, which serves to ensure that before the treatment, both groups have the samples with the same characteristics, thus ensuring that the results of the experiment would not be influenced by any confounding variables that the samples have.</u>
Chip is doing this to ensure that samples that have been influenced by other variables which determine their decision to hire are distributed evenly in both the experimental and control group.
Answer:
Production 830,000
Explanation:

- FG(units)
Beginning 31,000
Ending 81,000
Sales 780,000
Production 830,000
<em>sales + ending - beginning = production</em>
<em />
We are asked for the finished good units to produce.
The raw materials are irrelevant in this question.
<h2>Question:</h2>
Q1. This organizational structure violates the unity of command principles because of dual reporting relationship.
Q2. It is a collection of independent, mostly single function enterprises that collaborate on a good or service.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
- <u>C</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>Matrix</u><u> </u><u>Organization</u><u> </u>
- <u>A</u><u>.</u><u> </u><u>Divisional</u><u> </u><u>Organization</u><u> </u>
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
That's my opinion and I hope it helps ^_^
<h2><u>#CARRYONLEARNING</u><u> </u></h2><h2><u>#STUDYWELL</u><u> </u></h2>
Answer: $4.38
Explanation:
Conversion costs are based on completed units so those units that are yet to be completed will be converted into equivalent units.
Units produced = Units completed and transferred out + equivalent WIP
= 169,000 + (26,000 * 79%)
= 169,000 + 20,540
= 189,540 units
Total Conversion costs = beginning conversion costs + conversion costs added during period
= 103,000 + 726,925
= $829,925
Conversion cost per equivalent share
= 829,925/189,540
= 4.3786
= $4.38