Answer: I think it is writing novels
Explanation:
I am sorry. I was just kidding with you Have a good day.
Answer:
We can use a current event for this one. Recently, the United States along with a few other countries have expelled Russian diplomats from their countries. Therefore, we have,
"In the recent days, countries like the US and the UK have expelled Russian diplomats from their countries, sparking a global effort to do the same."
This relates to the international organization because it talks about a break of unity between these countries that abrupt;y breaks diplomatic relations that previously were existent and well.
Answer:
Confirmation
Explanation:
In scenarios whereby an individual gives more credence to the his or her existing belief while failing to give consideration to happenings or possibilities which may say otherwise. We might see this a an act of being rigid on a certain piece of information or belief to the extent than one dispels all possible scenarios which may prove the otherwise to the belief. In the scenario above, Carmellas existing belief thatbtge inability to deliver at work is only based in incompetence of the worker while filing to examine the possibility whereby the tasks being dished out to the worker might be difficult.
Answer:
To encourage family- teacher partnership, she possess certain qualities and applied a good convincing technique which made parents believed in her as a good family teacher.
The examples includes;
1. She often asked the parents how they think their children are doing and got feedback.
2. She has a parent communication notebook which she check frequently for details.
3. She make sure that parents know they are welcome and invited into the classroom at all times.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
