Answer:
The correct answer is c) Increasing government spending in order to increase aggregate demand
Explanation:
Fiscal policy is based on the ideas of the economist Jhon Keynes, who says that governments could stabilize the business cycle and regulate economic output by adjusting spending and tax policies.
There are two common types of Fiscal policy: "Expansionary policies and Contractionary policies".
For this problem is necessary an Expansionary policy
<u>Spending</u>: The government may generate economic expansion through increases in spending. The government could increase employment, pushing up demand and growth.
<u>Taxes</u>: When people pay lower taxes, they have more money to spend or invest, which traduce into a higher demand
Answer:
The change in net working capital resulting from the addition of the microbrewery is $5,500 (decrease)
Explanation:
There are 3 key elements of working capital. These are;
- Inventory
- Accounts payable
- Accounts receivable
Given;
increase in inventory = $8,000
increase in Accounts payable = $2,500
Change in net working capital resulting from the addition of the microbrewery = -$8,000 + $2,500
= -$5,500
Answer:
Product Mix
Explanation:
Product Mix is defined as the combination of products produced to increase the market share of the company and ultimately the profits for a company. The Procter and Gamble (P&G) Company produces many different products including deodorants, cookies, shampoo, cake mix, disposable diapers, laundry detergents, bar soaps and many other types of products to increase the market share of the company.
Answer:
b. helps identify the variable within a project that presents the greatest forecasting risk.
Explanation:
Sensitivity analysis refer to the financial model that measures how the variable i.e. target one should be impacted and depend on the change in the other variable that we called as an input variable
In this, it would help to identify the variable that lies within the project and provide the high risk of forecasting
Therefore the option b is correct
Based on the scenario, it is considered to be false. The
school of Jordan won’t be sued for tortious interference with existing
contractual relationship because it doesn’t even prove that the person involved
had intentionally damage one’s contractual or business relationship of which
Jordan didn’t even engaged to.