Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Kalani and lael are students who have been comparing the total kinetic energy of an iceberg to an ice cube
Kalani’s Argument: My claim is that an iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube. This is because even though an iceberg is about the same temperature as an ice cube, it is also much larger, so it is made of a lot more molecules. For this reason, an iceberg will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube.
Lael's Argument: An iceberg has more total kinetic energy (thermal energy) than an ice cube because it is larger and made of more molecules. This matters because molecules move, and moving things have kinetic energy, so each molecule adds its kinetic energy to the total. Since the iceberg and the ice cube are around the same temperature, the fact that the iceberg has extra molecules means that it will have more total kinetic energy (thermal energy).
Which argument is more convincing?
Answer:
Kalani's argument is more convincing.
Explanation:
Lael says that the fact that Icebrg has extra molecules means that it has greater kinetic energy and this is not true, since the kinetic energy is greater in bodies and objects that have greater speed. In addition, speed increases as a body has greater mass. In this case, we can consider Kalani's argument as more convincing, since she related the kinetic energy to the mass of the iceberg.
1. underline directions circle mall
2. underline lean circle tree
3. underline underneath circle missing library book
4. underline beside him circle her hand
5. underline arrived circle teacher? (not so sure)
6. underline through circle trees
7. underline in circle miniature train
8. underline in circle the Till whatever that name is
9. underline wrote circle the name of the song
10. underline noisy bird circle the roof.
not so sure about some of the last ones kinda hard
but a preposition is telling where something is
think of it like a position
preposition
tells where something is
"A Genetics of Justice" by Julia Alvarez is a story of a totalitarian government and a young girl. "Trujillo's vanity knew no bounds," provides the best evidence for the central idea. Thus, option B is correct.
<h3>What is the central idea?</h3>
A central idea is the theme of the literary work that gives the insight and the idea of the whole passage or the poem. It deduces the main points and the concept the writer wants the readers to understand.
The statement depicts how Trujillo was worried and concerned about his appearance which led him to build the high heels, Napoleonic hats, etc. that made him look good and hence supports the theme.
Therefore, option B. Trujillo's vanity knew no bounds is the best evidence.
Learn more about the central idea here:
brainly.com/question/16321889
#SPJ1
The answer is a, ababcdcd
Answer:
J. Alfred Prufrock conjures up the image of a man who is struck with anxiety
Explanation:
J. Alfred Prufrock is an overthinker just by reading the poem. Through the authors use of the literary element "stream of conciousness" the idea of being trapped and stuck in your thoughts is evident in the poem, in how Prufrock often loses track of his thoughts and overthinks about even small things. The way he thinks shows his anxiety and the way he speaks about himself shows this idea.
