The Truman doctrine and NATO were United States responses to the communist threat after WWII.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not mention what crisis you are referring to.
Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about.
However, trying to help, we can assume you are talking about the Cold War crisis because it was the Soviet Union that coined that phrase after the Cold War years.
So if that is teh case, what would happen to the idea of peaceful co-existence as a result of this crisis was that the two world superpowers of that time -the Soviet Union and the United States- had to learn to live in relative coexistence and "peace," after so many years of competing in the arms race, the space race, and the spread-containment of Communism around the world.
These countries had to learn how to coexists, more for necessity, rather than conviction.
Reduces their power--elites in Latin America control economic and political aspects of society. Reforms would provide more groups with rights, reducing the influence of the elite.
In any country, elites often control the means of production and the political system. Reforms, especially coming from lower classes or oppressed groups, would potentially reduce the power and influence the elite group has. This has been true through many revolutionary movements.
I think it is the last one if not then it is the first one
Answer:
The South's greatest strength lay in the fact that it was fighting on the defensive in its own territory. Being familiar with the land made exporting easier.
Explanation:
