Answer:
Boston Tea Party. a raid on three British ships in Boston Harbor (December 16, 1773) in which Boston colonists, disguised as Indians, threw the contents of several hundred chests of tea into the harbor as a protest against British taxes on tea and against the monopoly granted the East India Company.
Explanation:
Boston Tea Party. a raid on three British ships in Boston Harbor (December 16, 1773) in which Boston colonists, disguised as Indians, threw the contents of several hundred chests of tea into the harbor as a protest against British taxes on tea and against the monopoly granted the East India Company.
Is an example of complements Hope this helps:)
Food production in north Korea has decreased by that country's emphasis on maintaining a formidable military.
<h3>How are the people of North Korea getting their food?</h3>
China can be described as the North Korea's biggest aid provider as well as trade partner.
It was recorded that In 2019, China food exports to the North was around $600 million including the importation of cereals, , hence, Food production in north Korea has decreased by that country's emphasis on maintaining a formidable military.
Learn more on north Korea at:
brainly.com/question/15842547
#SPJ1
Answer:Exclusive Distribution
Explanation:
As the Honey Farms is making the Finest Chocolates, therefore, they will go for Exclusive Distribution to distribute their new Product.
Exclusive Distribution as the name suggests is an agreement between the manufacturer and Distributor that the manufacturer will not sell their Product to anyone else and will sell only to the exclusive distributor.
It can help the manufacturer in the following ways
- Focus: Company is more Focused as it no longer needs to worry about the distribution of products.
- Control: As the distributor is dependent on the manufacturer so the company is in complete control.
- Inventory: Exclusive distribution allows the manufacturer to store a large amount of inventory.
Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
