The scenarios that are applicable to the driving situations one may find themselves in are:
<h3>
What do you do when the car is forced into the guardrail?</h3>
Best response: I will keep my hands on the wheel and come to a halt gradually. The reason for keeping my hands on the wheel is to ensure that I don't lose control. This will enable me to gradually steer away from the guard rail. The next step is to gradually ease back onto the speed lane. It is improper to slam on the brakes at this point because it would cause a collision with the vehicle behind.
Scenario 2: When driving on a wet road and the car begins to slide
Best response:
It is not advisable to increase speed. It is not advisable to pump the brakes. It is not advisable to even depress the brake pedal and hold it down gently. The best thing to do is to ease one foot off the accelerator. At this time, there should be no sharp turns.
Scenario 3: When you are in a slow traffic and you hear the siren of an ambulance behind
Best response: The best thing to do at this point is to move to the right of the lane and stop.
This helps to prevent the patient in the ambulance from dying. It also ensures that the ambulance has clear way to pass. It is NOT advised to move to the left. That will cause more problems. It is better to stay on the lane if there is no way to park on the right shoulder of the road.
Learn more about driving scenarios at;
brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
The judge should allow it and overrule it. But regarding the evidence that they have of the plaintiff and dependent, maybe ask to see the medical bills and/or anything to prove that that actually happened
I want to say the nineteenth century not 100% sure though
Answer:
The election of the president and the vice president of the United States is an indirect election in which citizens of the United States who are registered to vote in one of the fifty U.S. states or in Washington, D.C., cast ballots not directly for those offices, but instead for members of the Electoral College.
Answer: C. A court’s power to adjudicate the rights to a given piece of property, including the power to seize and hold it.
Explanation: In rem jurisdiction ("power about or against 'the thing") is a legal term describing the power a court may exercise over property (either real or personal) or a "status" against a person over whom the court does not have in personam jurisdiction. Jurisdiction in rem assumes the property or status is the primary object of the action, rather than personal liabilities not necessarily associated with the property.
