Restrictions on free speech as based on content were one of the issues discussed in the <span>New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and Texas v. Johnson. The first landmark first initiated the anti malice standard which establishes slander on government officials which has also the same principle as of Texas v. Johnson.</span>
I believe the answer is: <span> were forced to pay high taxes.
</span><span>Peter Stuyvesant had the ambition to expand Netherlands colony in order to compete with British Empire.
Because of this, he forced the colonies to pay high taxes in order to improve the state income.</span>
Mostly all the the brass intruments and the piano
12 • 5 = 60ft.
3 • 2 = 6ft.
60 + 6 = 66ft. squared
I would most possibly do the same thing, or take the south back to US as brothers, but I might also add a little punishment. The punishment would be limited import for a period of years (1, or 5). I would also not allow them to vote or participate in any political meeting, congressional decisions, etc.
Hope this helps, you might have a different opinion however, but as I think, it would be better to punish them for
1. Not obeying the rules (still having slavery)
2. Electing a secondary president.
3. Helping the war happen.
4. Trying to become independent from the rest of US.